Style Guide

Section headers shouldn’t be necessary in short posts (of fewer than 1500 words) that are straightforward. More complex posts should use section headers, starting with the second paragraph. The first paragraph should sum up the post, and end with the “Read More” tag, which looks like this: <!--more-->

Use <strong>The Bold Tag</strong> For Section Headers, Capitalized Like Titles

Use <em>italics</em> for titles of books as well as print magazines (but not online ones), such as Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels or the Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition, and also for plain ol’ emphasis, hence emphasis. Don’t italicize the punctuation mark at the end, <em>like so</em>, and <em>like so</em>.

Punctuation

When a colon is used to connect one complete sentence with another, capitalize the first word after the colon: This is how it is done. But when a colon is used to connect a complete sentence with an incomplete one, then do not capitalize the first word after the colon, such as with lists: apple, banana, cantaloupe.

Use semicolons 1) when you write a list in which the different parts contain commas, and thus you have to differentiate them more precisely; 2) when you want to relate two sentences more closely to each other than a period allows, although even then it should be used sparingly; and 3) when you find it to be appropriate for any other reason. Including numbers in such a list is optional.

Type two consecutive hyphens (--) in the plain text editor to produce a dash — a long “em dash” when using spaces separating the two hyphens from the two words on either side — like so. If you use the WYSIWYG (or “Visual”) editor, just use an em dash with spaces on either side, perhaps one that you’ve copied from elsewhere. To keep things simple, don’t bother with the shorter “en dash,” and instead just use a single hyphen for dates (e.g., 1999-2001), Bible verses (e.g., Ephesians 5:22-24), and other such things.

He wrote, “Use double quotation marks for shorter quotations, and ‘single quotation marks’ for quotations inside of those.” He also wrote that one should “keep punctuation marks of one pen stroke inside the quotation marks,” and “put punctuation marks of two pen strokes outside the quotation marks”; I suppose that it just looks better that way. (When using an invented quotation that might be mistaken for a genuine quotation, use either single quotation marks or italics, e.g., Fools such as Paul Ryan say, But surely this cannot happen to us!)

Block Quotations & Scripture Quotations

Blockquotes are for quotations that take up more than three lines in a blockquote when viewed fullscreen on a desktop or laptop. When the quotation gets to be over about 250 characters (including spaces), or about 40-50 words (depending on word length, of course), use a blockquote and see if the text runs three full lines and at least starts in on a fourth.

<blockquote>Note: Use a blockquote inside a blockquote when the material you are quoting uses a blockquote, regardless of length.</blockquote>

26When you quote multiple verses of Scripture at once in a blockquote, use superscript numbers like <sup>26</sup> to indicate each verse. 27Shorter quotations, typically ones of just one verse, or part of a verse, don’t require superscript numbers. 28In those cases, the citation at the end is sufficient. 29The citation at the end looks like the following. (Galatians 3:26-29 KJV)

Source Citations & Links

With regard to the Bible, unless you’re comparing translations or doing in-depth scriptural interpretation that necessitates the use of more literal translations, stick with the KJV — for purposes of poetry and cultural continuity. For direct quotations, include “KJV” (or other abbreviation, if using another translation). Link to cited verses in the manner seen above.

Instead of footnotes, use hyperlinks (or parentheticals). Here’s what a hyperlink looks like in HTML:

Visit <a href=”http://sonsofeuropa.com/”>Sons of Europa.</a>

It ends up looking like this:

Visit Sons of Europa.

(If the punctuation at the end of the link is one stroke of the pen, include it in the link. If it is two strokes, exclude it. Example: like this.)

If your source is a book, link to a public PDF, or use a Google Books link with the relevant text highlighted. If you can’t do either, then include an informal in-text citation that provides enough information for someone to find what you mention.

Use archive.org links when linking any government (.gov) site (like this), the ADL, the SPLC, or any other communist/antifa site.

No Symbols For White Men: Why The ADL & SPLC Condemned A Frog

The calls in recent years to ban Confederate symbols and historical figures from the public square were initially explained as addressing particular historical or contemporary grievances, typically of a racial nature. But the quick extension of such bans to various other symbols and figures with little or no connection to the Confederacy, and even to seemingly innocuous things such as a cartoon frog named Pepe, has strongly suggested that this explanation is insufficient. A simpler, more comprehensive explanation for these calls to ban supposedly “racist” or “white supremacist” symbols is that they attempt to remove from public acceptability anything that might lend support to white people positively identifying themselves as a group. Continue reading “No Symbols For White Men: Why The ADL & SPLC Condemned A Frog”

Is Christian Love Egalitarian? Familial Duty In The New Testament

Christianity is often presented today as a religion whose adherents are to care for everyone “equally.” One logical tendency of this egalitarianism is to flatten all human affection, and thus deny the particular, natural affections for one’s own relations. But this denial runs counter to the explicit teaching of the New Testament whereby affection for kin is permitted, expected, and even demanded — a teaching affirmed by the example of Christ Himself. Continue reading “Is Christian Love Egalitarian? Familial Duty In The New Testament”

Christianity & Non-Discrimination: Equal In The Eyes Of God?

Christianity today is often portrayed as a religion of non-discrimination, whose adherents are not supposed to recognize or act upon distinctions between groups on the basis of race, sex, etc. But the arguments typically put forward are insufficient to establish non-discrimination as a matter of doctrine. A few of the more common viewpoints will be addressed here, namely that non-discrimination is demanded by some sort of equality of men in the eyes of God, by the supposed unimportance of biological differences, by man’s creation in the image of God, and by man’s common ancestry. Continue reading “Christianity & Non-Discrimination: Equal In The Eyes Of God?”

No “Respect Of Persons”: Biblical Impartiality, Or Non-Discrimination?

Throughout the Bible, one finds condemnation of “respect of persons,” a term most often referring to partiality in judgment. Some have claimed that this means condemnation of discrimination in general. The strongest example supporting this view is perhaps James 2:1-9, which popular theologian John Piper uses to claim that racism is a sin. But such attempts to expand the meaning of “respect of persons” in this passage are unwarranted, given the term’s use in context and elsewhere in Scripture. It is far more plausible that this passage encourages equitable judgment, instead of declaring a new teaching of non-discrimination. Continue reading “No “Respect Of Persons”: Biblical Impartiality, Or Non-Discrimination?”

Conservatives Love Identity Politics, Except For White People

A recurring theme of American conservative political commentary is that identity politics is an evil tool of the left to be shunned by the “principled” right. But conservatives regularly employ identity politics when it’s useful for them. This was especially evident in the 2016 election cycle, when conservative commentators relied considerably on appeals to identity than on appeals to facts and reason, which they claim to prefer. But there is one form of identity politics that they shun and denounce consistently, namely white identity politics. Continue reading “Conservatives Love Identity Politics, Except For White People”

Good Samaritan: Love Of Neighbor, Not Refugee Resettlement

Are Christians obligated as “good Samaritans” to encourage their nations to bring in refugees of war? No. As opposed to popular culture’s proof-texting of the parable of the good Samaritan, Christianity does not require, as some suggest, the relocation of foreigners from distant lands to one’s own country. And it certainly does not require being concerned with the well-being of those foreigners more than the well-being of one’s fellow citizens. If anything, the parable of the good Samaritan discourages the privileging of foreigners to one’s actual neighbors. Continue reading “Good Samaritan: Love Of Neighbor, Not Refugee Resettlement”

Americans First: The Foundation Of The Declaration & Constitution

The political philosophy expressed in the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution demands a government that puts the good of the American people first, in securing their rights and pursuing their common good. This stands in contrast to the notion today, often pushed by conservatives, that America instead stands for universal ideals that ultimately demand the subordination of the good of American citizens to the good of non-citizens. Continue reading “Americans First: The Foundation Of The Declaration & Constitution”

“Neither Jew Nor Greek”: Is Alt-Right Race Realism Unchristian?

Is it improper for a Christian to notice significant biological differences between racial groups, and to allow such knowledge to influence his thinking and behavior? Erick Erickson seems to suggest as much when he contends that the race realism of the alt-right contradicts biblical teaching, in particular Paul’s statement in Galatians 3:28 that “there is neither Jew nor Greek […] for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.” Erickson claims that this verse commands Christians to “transcend race” — in other words, to deny or disregard racial differences. But this verse and others like it clearly concern a sort of equality between Christians with respect to their salvation, not total equality between all people, or all races. Continue reading ““Neither Jew Nor Greek”: Is Alt-Right Race Realism Unchristian?”